<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft BrowserRank versus Google PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlineever.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/microsoft-browserrank-versus-google-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlineever.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/microsoft-browserrank-versus-google-pagerank/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toni Anicic</title>
		<link>http://onlineever.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/microsoft-browserrank-versus-google-pagerank/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni Anicic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineever.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Microsoft made a good point there. A good relevance factor would be time spent on site and most of the spammy and ads only websites wouldn&#039;t be able to fight that algorithm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft made a good point there. A good relevance factor would be time spent on site and most of the spammy and ads only websites wouldn&#8217;t be able to fight that algorithm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
